Once again, we have a new group of scholars claiming that World Trade Center Building #7, the third building to collapse due to the terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001, was brought down by controlled demolition. However, this time it is different. The University of Alaska spent 4 years and $300,000 to investigate the true cause of the free-fall collapse exhibited late in the afternoon on 9/11. Their exhaustive report is 126 pages long, and its conclusions will have far-reaching effects worldwide.
Richard Gage was clearly elated with the news of the report in his interview with Truth-In-Media’s Ben Swann: “This was the work that NIST should have done but didn’t. This finite element computer analysis modeling proves that this building could not have come down by fire.” The study directly contradicts the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST)’s assertion that “normal office fires” caused WTC 7 to collapse. “The study did present how this building could have come down, and most of the models depicted all 82 columns being removed at the same time at some point in the building to pull the building down at near free-fall speed,” Gage continued. Overall, Gage felt that the study was complete and thorough. Where NIST’s mistakes were intentional or unintentional, they were mistakes nonetheless. Richard Gage at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth has spent years educating folks on his theories on what caused these collapses—or in his words—explosions, and his studies have also produced similar conclusions. He has gathered support from over 2500 other architects and engineers and was the main contributor for financing this report with the university.
The study utilized the original blueprints from World Trade Center #7 and processed these plans through multiple computer simulations. In the end, they found that NIST’s explanation was mathematically impossible and logically improbable. Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey led the investigation: “The NIST report tells us that girder 2001 was ‘pushed or rocked’ off of columns 44 and 79, which caused the imminent collapse. This is impossible. They did not even include the side plates which hold these columns in place [in any of their models]. They weren’t even there!” Without a doubt, the length and scope of this investigation sets it apart from other hypotheses. Dr. Hulsey used experts with perfect backgrounds for the investigation. His teammates were Feng Xiao, an Associate Professor at Nanjing University of Science and Technology, and Zhili Quan, a Bridge Engineer for the South Carolina Department of Transportation.
The study is undeniably groundbreaking and will send shockwaves throughout the scientific and political communities alike. Ultimately, the Dr. Hulsey and his team at the University of Alaska concluded that
the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building. Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11th, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.
The evidence in the report is backed by exhaustive research that took over 4 years to complete. The investigative team was backed by a credible institution with the University of Alaska and fellow contributors like Richard Gage who have spent years researching the collapses on 9/11. Furthermore, the investigative team was comprised of individuals with highly reputable backgrounds with areas of expertise perfectly suitable for the project. The University spent 1 more year than NIST researching their findings, and they also used better technology and methods to come up with their conclusions.
You can view one computer simulation which depicts column failures in the exact areas NIST specified—The building simply falls off of its base, depicting a completely different type of engineering failure:
Ben Swann’s full interview with Richard Gage, Founder of AE911truth:
Watch the video of the controlled demolition for yourself:
It is obvious that we have all been lied to. For that building to come down as this report suggests, a team of individuals had to have placed explosives throughout the building. This is where conjecture and speculation take over. It is ultimately hard to say what happened, which is why we need investigations into the mechanics of the operation. We now know the science, the next step is to uncover the mad scientist. Considering that the building was one of the most secure buildings on the planet, it is hard not to ignore all of those crazy “conspiracy theorists” who claim that “9/11 was an inside job.” They may be right, literally and figuratively. The World Trade Center 7 Building housed Mayor Rudy Giuliani’s safe house, offices for the CIA, FBI, and NSA, among others. And for whatever reason, they all had advanced notice to evacuate before the building came down, according to first-hand witness and former WTC employee Barry Jennings:
What are the next steps for America to take? Well, it is probably time that we convene a Federal grand jury to start re-investigating some of the anomalies that occurred on September 11th, 2001—and the good news is, a New York Fire Commission just voted unanimously to do exactly that. Hopefully, this movement will continue to snowball as more and more people feel comfortable with asserting that what they see is real, that what they feel, is real. We have rejected our natural instincts on this subject for far too long. It is time to reopen the infected wound so that we can clean it, and close it for good.
Proof Govt Wrong About WTC7? (New Evidence 2019), Ben Swann, Truth In Media. YouTube: https//youtu.be/Atv31d1BmLs.